The ReceiptThe Receipt

Contributors

The people doing the verifying.

Every score on this platform stands on evidence, and much of that evidence comes from citizens. Nobody here uses a real name. Reputation belongs to the handle, not the person. That's the design.

How reputation works

Points follow usefulness, not volume. Evidence that survives editorial review earns the most. Confirmed promise verdicts earn moderate points. Raw opinions earn little. Flooding the platform earns nothing, quality-weighted scoring makes a thousand junk submissions worth less than one verified photo.

Token economics

Tokens are minted only when an editor approves a submission, never on raw submission volume. Delivery proof (evidence that confirms or refutes a promise's status) earns the most. Evidence generally earns high. Testimony earns low. Each handle has a monthly token cap, approvals past the cap still earn reputation, just not tokens. If the token economy is opaque, it will be assumed corrupt, so here are the numbers.

Delivery proof
80 / approval
Evidence
50 / approval
Issue upheld
30 / approval
Testimony
10 / approval

Monthly cap: 500 tokens per handle. Conversion to the crypto reward pool is quarterly.

Rewards

Each December, every state's top contributor receives a crypto award, paid to any wallet address they choose. No name, no bank account, no KYC. Recognition without identification. Every payout is published as a transaction hash.

The claim flow is built and gated behind a feature flag until the reward pool is funded. Rails first, switch later.

State leaderboards

Abia

  1. 1shamaru0